「暗黒エネルギー」は存在しない? Ia超新星の光度は実は進化して「暗黒エネルギーは必要ない」と話題

ニュース速報

1:2020/01/10(金) 13:36:56.53ID:nQ0E93DJ0●
New evidence shows that the key assumption made in the discovery of dark energy is in error

The most direct and strongest evidence for the accelerating universe with dark energy is provided by the distance measurements using type Ia supernovae (SN Ia) for the galaxies at high redshift.
This result is based on the assumption that the corrected luminosity of SN Ia through the empirical standardization would not evolve with redshift.

New observations and analysis made by a team of astronomers at Yonsei University (Seoul, South Korea), together with their collaborators at Lyon University and KASI, show, however, that this key assumption is most likely in error.
The team has performed very high-quality (signal-to-noise ratio ‾175) spectroscopic observations to cover most of the reported nearby early-type host galaxies of SN Ia, from which they obtained the most direct and reliable measurements of population ages for these host galaxies.
They find a significant correlation between SN luminosity and stellar population age at a 99.5 percent confidence level.
As such, this is the most direct and stringent test ever made for the luminosity evolution of SN Ia.
Since SN progenitors in host galaxies are getting younger with redshift (look-back time), this result inevitably indicates a serious systematic bias with redshift in SN cosmology.
Taken at face values, the luminosity evolution of SN is significant enough to question the very existence of dark energy.
When the luminosity evolution of SN is properly taken into account, the team found that the evidence for the existence of dark energy simply goes away (see Figure 1).

https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/800/2020/newevidences.jpg

Figure 1. Luminosity evolution mimicking dark energy in supernova (SN) cosmology.
The Hubble residual is the difference in SN luminosity with respect to the cosmological model without dark energy (the black dotted line).
The cyan circles are the binned SN data from Betoule et al. (2014). The red line is the evolution curve based on our age dating of early-type host galaxies.
The comparison of our evolution curve with SN data shows that the luminosity evolution can mimic Hubble residuals used in the discovery and inference of the dark energy (the black solid line). Credit: Yonsei University

つづきはそーす
https://phys.org/news/2020-01-evidence-key-assumption-discovery-dark.amp

85:2020/01/11(土) 22:25:14.49ID:twNas1KF0.

これがないと光速以上の速さで膨張してる宇宙の謎が解けないんじゃなかったっけ?

でも前から疑問だったけど膨張は加速してるってやつさ
特に遠い星が遠ざかっていくスピードがどんどん加速してるってやつさ
その確認してる加速は何十億年前の状態ってことはないのかと

45:2020/01/10(金) 14:46:04.08ID:3T97EELz0.

昔ビックバンに巻き込まれて大変だった

84:2020/01/11(土) 17:39:27.85ID:4iQp5IlB0.

赤方偏移の原因が違っていたということか

72:2020/01/10(金) 21:11:20.09ID:4/axlK3a0.

いや、謎エネルギーが無いというなら
ビッグクランチに向かうん?

65:2020/01/10(金) 17:36:19.02ID:l/KaKx4R0.

なるほどなるほど、あー、わからん

1 2020/01/10(金) 13:36:56.53ID:nQ0E93DJ0●.

30:2020/01/10(金) 14:06:56.47ID:kWSxgEPy0.

>>1

完全に理解できた
わかりやすい解説乙〜

32:2020/01/10(金) 14:07:38.42ID:1aaW+7F20.

物量界、科学界は唯物論が絶対条件であるから、量子論まで突き詰めると限界や矛盾が出てくる。
形而上学で考えれば全ての矛盾が解けるが、まだまだ量子論がデタラメだらけでそこまで到達出来ていない。
後、50年は掛かるかな?

74:2020/01/10(金) 21:18:55.77ID:XZIH3eVL0.

やっぱりな余裕で分からん

18:2020/01/10(金) 13:58:07.20ID:q2zOlutk0.

銀河内サーベイしたら観測精度向上やらで続々星が見つかるし
未発見時の推定質量で計算してた事を考えるとダークマターは
いらんのではとずっと思ってる

55 2020/01/10(金) 16:37:33.96ID:/8ITNK6r0.

> New observations and analysis made by a team
> of astronomers at Yonsei University (
> Seoul, South Korea
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

はい、解散

62 2020/01/10(金) 17:08:20.30ID:7+J8chPN0.

僕の股間も暗黒エネルギーの影響で
怒張が過去最大規模になってる。

66:2020/01/10(金) 17:36:19.41ID:oot9r8J70.

>>62

確認できませーん

3:2020/01/10(金) 13:41:19.14ID:th3VCaMx0.

あーよくわかった

61:2020/01/10(金) 16:51:57.42ID:z/ZwB/kF0.

悪魔の証明までは求めないので、せめて範囲の狭い「太陽系内にダークマターはありませんでした!」くらい捜索しておけって。

69:2020/01/10(金) 18:43:38.81ID:WH+P3at50.

空間の膨張で説明できそうなもんだが

4:2020/01/10(金) 13:41:40.79ID:S7ixpLwy0.

ソウダッタノカー

56:2020/01/10(金) 16:40:25.90ID:qCG7IieW0.

>>55

wwwwwwww

コメント

タイトルとURLをコピーしました